|
|
| HOME | NEWS | CONFERENCES | CONVERSATIONS | LINKS | SUPPORT | ABOUT |
|
Summary of Michael McKubre's Comments on the the 2004 DoE Review |
|
|
|
MARSEILLE, FRANCE, Nov. 1, 2004 -- Dr. Michael McKubre, director of the Energy Research Center at SRI International, presented an excellent overview of the process for the 2004 U.S. Department of Energy Cold Fusion Review. |
|
The representatives from the cold fusion community asked for several things: |
| - For the DOE to examine the progress of cold fusion research since 1989. |
| - To decide if there is real science involved. |
| - To decide if cold fusion research deserves further DOE attention. |
|
- To consider if
there may be a new energy technology. |
|
- To consider if
there are new physics involved. |
| - A broad, inclusive review of the field which would be both public and transparent, that was and appeared objective. |
|
- To be involved
in the process. |
|
The DOE
responded with the following parameters: |
|
- The focus would
be very narrow. |
|
- They did not
want transparency. |
|
- They did not
want any direct communications to the public from the reviewers. |
|
- Their
expectations were to produce a simple sentence or two
summarizing the overall conclusions. |
|
- They wanted to
get the job done quickly. |
|
The
Focus of the subject matter: |
|
-
Empirical, experimental observations. |
|
-
The original Fleischmann-Pons claims of excess heat. |
|
-
The original Jones claims of neutrons and charged particles. |
|
The
evidence: |
|
-
A new physical phenomenon that creates heat in metal deuterides. |
|
-
The amounts of heat created was far beyond any possible chemical
reaction, that the signal to noise ratios were significant, and
that the effects were observed through a variety of methods. |
|
-
The observations have been reproduced, and are highly
reproducible when the proper conditions are achieved. |
|
-
Many of the reasons for past reproducibility failures have now
been discovered. |
|
New
understanding: |
|
-
Helium-4 has been demonstrated to be the primary nuclear product
of the reaction. |
|
-
Helium-4 production is shown to be in proportion to the
generated heat in agreement with the reaction path: D + D -> 4He + 23.8 MeV (heat). |
|
-
The reactions also emit energetic alphas and protons. |
|
-
Tritium production is noted. |
|
-
The observations do not agree with known science and represent
new science. |
|
-
The underlying processes are not yet fully understood. |
|
-
The subject matter is worthy of further attention and
large-scale investigation. |
|
Participants
at the August 23, 2004 Oral Review |
|
- Presenters:
Jones, Lipson, Hubler, Violante, Hagelstein, McKubre |
|
- Organizers:
Hekman, Nagel |
|
- DoE:
P. Dehmer (not present), G. Henry, J. Horwitz, D, Kovar |
|
|||||||
|
İNew Energy Times tm All Rights Reserved 2005 |