| Fusion Claim Generates Hope, Skepticism
By Michael White, AP Writer
The Associated Press
Friday, March 24, 1989, PM cycle
Two scientists say they have produced controlled nuclear fusion
through basic
chemistry, a claim that has evoked skepticism from other researchers.
But some also expressed hope that a long-sought source of clean, abundant
energy may be on the horizon.
Martin Fleischmann of the University of Southampton in England and B.
Stanley
Pons, chairman of the University of Utah chemistry department, said their
electrochemical process has produced a surplus of energy for periods of up to
100 hours.
They cautioned that more research is needed to determine whether the
process
will work on a large scale.
"What we have done is opened the door of a new research area," Fleischmann
told a news conference Thursday. "Our indications are that the discovery
will be
relatively easy to make into a usable technology for generating heat and
power."
Hoping that will be the case, the University of Utah has applied for
patents.
Edward Teller, director emeritus of the Lawrence Livermore Laboratory and
"the father of the hydrogen bomb," said he initially was skeptical,
feeling that
it could never happen, but, "I am extremely happy now because I see a very
good
chance that I was completely wrong."
Robert Sherman of the Los Alamos National Laboratory, a fusion
researcher for
14 years, said: "Based on the sketchy information I have, there's nothing to
indicate they've really accomplished anything."
In fusion reactions, the nuclei of two heavy hydrogen atoms are
combined to
become the nucleus of a helium atom. The process releases a tremendous
amount of
energy.
Fusion occurs in the sun and in hydrogen bombs. But Pons said the new
process
can be carried out in simple glass flasks at room temperature.
Heavy water - water containing heavy hydrogen or deuterium - circulates
between a negatively charged palladium metal rod and a positively charged
platinum cylinder.
The electrical current drives deuterium nuclei (deuterons) into the
lattice
structure of the palladium. Pons says the lattice structure holds the
deuterons
close together long enough for fusion to occur.
The two scientists say the heat generated in the experiment shows that
fusion
has occurred.
"We took so much heat out, it cannot be accounted for in conventional
chemical reactions," Fleischmann said.
The two said they have not measured the neutrons produced, and that makes
Sherman and some of his colleagues skeptical.
"We don't see that (the process) gets the nuclei close enough to each
other
to interact," Sherman said. "If they're going to have fusion, they've got to
show me they have neutrons of the right energy and the right time."
He said he and others have used palladium for years to purify hydrogen and
"nobody has seen such a reaction."
Teller said his experience with palladium makes him think the process
could
work, and, if so, it "will be very significant for our knowledge of the solid
state of metals and it may be very important for our energy production."
Pons said he and Fleischmann developed the technique after 5 1/2 years of
research. They now are seeking a grant from the federal Department of
Energy to
continue their research.
For more than 30 years physicists worldwide have tried to produce
controlled
fusion, but at a cost of millions of dollars and with huge machines and
lasers.
Meanwhile, other scientists said the experiment will have to be duplicated
independently before the findings of Pons and Fleischmann can be accepted.
"People are pushing cold-temperature nuclear fusion quite vigorously these
days. Like any science, this claim has to be reproducable. If it is indeed
there, it is quite a discovery," said Chan Choi, a fusion researcher at Purdue
University's School of Nuclear Engineering.
(In accordance with Title 17, Section 107, of the U.S. Code, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. New Energy Times has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of the original text in this article; nor is New Energy Times
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on New Energy Times may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
|