|
Nuclear Fusion in a Test Tube
By Clive Cookson
Financial Times [London,England]
Thursday, March 23, 1989
This is the test tube in which Professors Martin Fleischmann and Stan Pons
claim to have achieved controlled nuclear fusion, in a chemistry laboratory at
the University of Utah.
If Fleischmann and Pons are right and nuclear fusion really can be carried
out in a relatively simple palladium electrode, their discovery will transform
the outlook for the world's energy supplies in the next century.
Unlike the fission process of the present generation of nuclear power
stations, fusion power would not generate radioactive waste. And unlike fossil
fuels, it would not contribute to the greenhouse effect and acid rain.
In the Utah experiment, a current passes between the palladium electrode and
a platinum anode in an insulated tube full of heavy water. Heavy water contains
deuterium, the heavy isotope of hydrogen, and occurs naturally in sea water.
What happens is that the palladium electrode in the centre of the cell
absorbs a large volume of deuterium. Under the influence of the electric
current, the deuterium nuclei are squeezed so tightly that some of them fuse
together.
Fleischmann says that to achieve the same effect by compressing deuterium
gas, the pressure would have to exceed a thousand million million million
million atmospheres (10 to the power of 27 atmospheres).
The two scientists are convinced that they have achieved nuclear fusion,
rather than a conventional chemical reaction, because very large amounts of heat
are released and because some of the expected products of fusion - tritium,
neutrons and gamma rays - are formed. Even so, it is not clear what fusion
processes are taking place.
So far the cell has operated only with heavy water containing deuterium.
Fleischmann and Pons believe that if they used a mixture of deuterium and
tritium, which should be more suitable for nuclear fusion, the amount of heat
released would be greater still - perhaps as much as 10 kilowatts per cubic
centimetre of palladium.
Such an experiment would be hazardous, however. Special containment
facilities would be required.
Their work could hardly be more of a contrast to the large government-funded
nuclear research projects which are trying to achieve fusion by heating gases
above 100 m deg C. Although some governments are becoming impatient with the
apparently slow progress towards a commercial fusion reactor, world-wide
expenditure on fusion research exceeds Dollars 1 bn (580 m Pounds (pds)) a year.
The most advanced fusion project is the Joint European Torus (JET) in Culham,
Oxfordshire, which receives 75 m pds-a-year funding from 14 European
governments. Half way through a 10-year experimental programme, JET has
achieved most of the technical goals set for it.
Scientists at JET have learnt how to confine a hot "plasma" of deuterium
inside a doughnut-shaped reactor, using an extremely sophisticated series of
magnets. But they are not expected to produce the conditions necessary for
fusion until 1992.
Even then, it is not clear whether JET will achieve the "break even" state,
in which the energy produced by the nuclear reaction exceeds the energy spent
heating up the reactor. Fleischmann and Pons say that their experiment is
comfortably in credit.
The idea for the experiment originated in the late 1960s, when Fleischmann
carried out research on the separation of hydrogen isotopes in a palladium
electrode. The results were rather "odd" and suggested to him that nuclear
reactions might be induced in an electrode. Pons reached similar conclusions
during his research in the 1970s.
The two men discussed ways of testing the idea while they were working
together at the University of Southampton, in the UK, and later at the
University of Utah. "Stan and I often talk of doing insane experiments," says
Fleischmann. "We each have a good track record of getting impossible
experiments to work. In this case, the stakes were so high that we just had to
try out the idea."
Supplies of raw materials for fusion are inexhaustible. The fusion energy
released from the deuterium contained in one cubic foot of sea water would be
the same as that produced by burning 10 tons of coal.
(In accordance with Title 17, Section 107, of the U.S. Code, this material
is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for research and educational
purposes. New Energy Times has no affiliation whatsoever with the
originator of the original text in this article; nor is New Energy Times
endorsed or sponsored by the originator.)
"Go to Original" links are provided as a convenience to our readers and allow for verification of authenticity. However, as originating pages are often updated by their originating host sites, the versions posted on New Energy Times may not match the versions our readers view when clicking the "Go to Original" links.
|