Errata to LENR Articles in Elsevier Encyclopedia of Electrochemical Power Sources
Publications and Presentations

   

Cold Fusion - Precursor to Low-Energy Nuclear Reactions

Page 255

Text states: was close to the value expected from the third branch of deuterium-deuterium thermonuclear fusion, 23.77 MeV.

Text should state: was close to the value expected from the third branch of deuterium-deuterium thermonuclear fusion, 23.85 MeV.

Additional information:
In the equation: D + D —> 4He + gamma:
23.8465 MeV = total energy of the entire branch.
23.77 MeV = gamma energy alone.
0.0765 MeV = energy from the recoil helium nucleus.

-----------

Page 256

Text states: prominently featured the work of the reviewer’s proponents.

Text should state: prominently featured the work of the review's proponents.

-----------

Page 256

Text states: if 'Q’ represents the amount of heat, ‘V’ the voltage, ‘I’ the current, and ‘t’ the time, then Q=VIt.

Additional information:
- Q should be denoted instead as E

Text should state: E represents the amount of electrical input energy

-----------

Page 257

Credit for Fig. 1 should state: Drawing by Craig Erlick for New Energy Times

-----------

Page 259

Text states: Garwin also wrote in his report, We have found no specific experimental artifact [that is, error] responsible for the finding of ‘excess heat’ in McKubre's laboratory.

Text should state: Garwin also wrote in his report, "We have found no specific experimental artifact [that is, error] responsible for the finding of ‘excess heat’ in McKubre's laboratory."

-----------

Page 260
Text states: M. Miles and J. O’M. Bockris at Texas A&M University subsequently performed experiments in stainless steel and detected
significant amounts of helium-4.

Text should state: A team led by J. O’M. Bockris at Texas A&M University subsequently performed an experiment in which the palladium cathode was later analyzed for helium-4. In 9 out of 10 samples, helium-4 was found in near-surface regions of the cathode at up to 100 times over background.

Ref: Chien, C.-C., Hodko, D., Minevski, Z. Bockris, J. O’M., On an Electrode Producing Massive Quantities of Tritium and Helium, J. Electroanal. Chem., 1992, 328, 189-212.

-----------

Page 261

Text states: These data support the claim that the helium-3 was created inside the chamber

Text should state: These data support the claim that the helium-3 or tritium was created inside the chamber; the original paper is ambiguous.

-----------

Page 266

Text states: The contents begin to bubble vigorously and then vaporise within seconds

Text should state: The contents begin to bubble vigorously and then vaporise within minutes

-----------

Page 266

Text states: (based on the volume of the lead cathode)

Text should state: (based on the volume of the palladium cathode)

Additional information:
Pd was misread in production as Pb

-----------

Page 266

Text states: its last 8 days with current turned off, boiled more than 15 l of water

Text should state: its last 8 days with current turned off, boiled 17.5 l of water

Additional information:
Total duration of experiment was longer than 8 days; total evaporation of water was more than 17.5 l.

-----------

Page 268

Label for Fig. 10 is in wrong place

Label should be on pg. 269 after text: heat from hydrogen as well as deuterium experiments.

-----------

Cold Fusion: History

Page 271

Text states: electrochemistry, the science behind battery research.

Text should state: electrochemistry, which includes the science behind battery research.

-----------

Page 272

Alfred Cöhn should have been written as Alfred Coehn

-----------